THRU THE BIBLE
EXPOSITION
Psalms: Living By
Faith In God
CXXV. God’s Rescue
From Strong Evil Influences
(Psalm 125:1-5)
Introduction: (To show the need . . .)
We believers in Christ face strong
evil influences:
(1) We face it in the secular realm:
“(T)he Southern Poverty Law Center” has a “‘hate map’” that “includes
conservative Christian law firms like Alliance Defending Freedom . . . parental
rights groups like Moms for Liberty, and groups of doctors who oppose . . .
transgender experiments often euphemistically referred to as ‘gender-affirming
care’ . . . (A) convicted terrorist used the SPLC ‘hate map’ to target the
Family Research Council in Washington, D. C., for an attempted mass
shooting. The SPLC condemned the attack,
but kept the council on the ‘hate map’ . . .” (Tyler O’Neil, “Comey versus the
‘white supremacist adjacent,’” Republican-American, May 21, 2025, p. A6)
(2) We face it in religious realms: A
letter to the Republican-American from Reverend Michael E. Carroll of
Plantsville (May 31, 2025, p. A6) reacted to a story in the paper about “Ken
Ham’s Ark Encounter.” Reverend Carroll critiqued
Mr. Ham’s literal interpretation of the Biblical book of Genesis, supporting
his critique by a citation from Nahum Sarna’s book, “Understanding Genesis”
that asserts of Genesis’ creation and Noahic Flood accounts, “‘(T)hese stories
should never be interpreted literally . . . or presented as historical or
scientific fact.’” (Ibid.). Reverend Carroll
wrote that when Babylon captured and took Judah’s people to Babylon in the 6th
century B. C., “(o)ne of the ways the Hebrew people were able to preserve their
faith . . . was to creatively convert the tales and sagas of their captors in a
way that reflected their own values and vision of God” (Ibid.). Thus, the “chief Babylonian deity Marduk’s
creation of the world in 7 days, as described in the epic ‘Enuma Elish,’”
allegedly “became the basis for Genesis 1.
Enki and Ninursag, a southern Mesopotamian creation story, was”
supposedly “transformed into the Garden of Eden account, augmented by the
sneaky snake from the ‘Epic of Gilgamesh.’
Utnapishtim, a Babylonian hero from Gilgamesh, is” thus presumably “transformed
into Noah, who saved his family and all the animals on an ark after the gods
decide to flood the world. Finally, a
certain King Enmerkar attempts to build a tower to heaven but is thwarted when
the god Enki scrambles the languages of the workers. This story was” allegedly “transformed into
the ‘Tower of Babel,’ a hilarious spoof on Marduk’s huge ziggurat (temple) in
Babylon.” (Ibid.)
(3) We face it even in evangelical
circles: I recently heard a report that teachings on prophecy by some
evangelicals are making believers anxious.
One evangelical pastor in particular warns that President Trump’s deals with
Arab nations look like the treaty the antichrist will make with the “many” in
Daniel 9:27 KJV to start the Tribulation.
His warning suggests that we might already be in the Tribulation, so a
believer asked me if the warning was true and could we know if the antichrist will
be a European or come from another place like the United States!
Our Church has long taught that 2 Thessalonians 2:3-17 reveals that we believers
should be comforted and established in every good word and work until Christ
takes us to heaven in the pretribulation rapture. Thus, fears raised by teachings that we may face
the antichrist and the Tribulation Period conflict with our long-taught beliefs!
Need: So, we
ask, “How does God want us to handle strong evil influences that we face?”
I.
Psalm 125:1-2 testified that believers who rely
upon the Lord enjoy God’s great security:
A. The Jebusite fortress that Israel’s king David conquered and made his city (2 Samuel 5:6-9) was called “Zion,” meaning “fortress,” and this name was eventually extended to include the temple site north of David’s city and then to all the later enlarged city of Jerusalem (H. A. W., Theol. Wrdbk. of the O. T., 1980, v. II, p. 764-765).
B. Verse 1 thus claimed that those who rely on the Lord will not be shaken but abide forever like Mount Zion.
C. Verse 2 added that as the mountains surround Jerusalem, the Lord always protectively surrounds His people.
II.
God’s security meets the need of God’s people to
handle rulers with strong evil influence, Psalm 125:3:
A. Verse three begins with the particle ki (Kittel, Biblia Hebraica, p. 1088), what in that verse means “for, because” (Ibid., H. A. W., vol. I, p. 438) to explain the author’s focus on the security God provided for Israel.
B. God’s people faced evil rulers, the KJV word “rod” meaning “scepter,” what the evil rulers stretched over the land to rule where God had “allotted” property to the upright as their inheritance, Psa. 125:3 ESV; Jos. 14:1-5.
C. Since Israel’s people were assigned their land by the Lord through the use of lots, God required that they live where He assigned them their lot regardless who ruled over them. However, that became a problem if the rulers were evil and their rule extended for such a long time that they influenced God’s people to sin!
D. To avoid such a situation, God determined to keep evil rulers from ruling long over His people, Psalm 123:3b.
III.
The psalmist thus called on God to do good to
those who were good and upright by removing evil rulers from them, banishing
them when they turned to crooked ways, that Israel might be at peace, v. 4-5.
Lesson: Believers can trust God to protect them
from overwhelming evil influence to do evil that they might have enough room,
motivation and strength to do what is right.
Application: (1) May we trust in Christ Who
died as our Atoning Sacrifice for sin that we might receive God's gift of
eternal life, John 3:16; 1 Corinthians 15:1-11.
(2) May we rely on God for Him to guard us from overwhelming evil
influences that we might always have the capacity to do what is upright. (cf. 1
Corinthians 10:13)
Conclusion: (To illustrate the message and/or provide additional guidance
. . .)
(1) On the evil influence
of the Southern Poverty Law Center with its “hate map” designations, “in 2019,
a former SPLC employee revealed that workers called it the ‘poverty palace’ and
called the ‘hate’ accusations a ‘highly profitable scam’” since the group’s
“hate” charges “‘scare donors into ponying up cash and . . . silence political
opponents’” (Ibid., O’Neil). We must
thus trust the Holy Spirit’s 2 Thessalonians 2:6 restraining ministry to give
us room in spite of the SPLC to live rightly in God’s comfort and to minister
as He promised in 2 Thessalonians 2:16-17.
(2) On Reverend
Carroll’s claim that the Hebrews based their Genesis accounts of creation, the flood
and the tower of Babel on Babylonian myths so that we should not interpret them
literally or treat them as historically or scientifically true, (a) acclaimed archaeologist
W. F. Albright wrote of the Pentateuch: “‘(N)ew discoveries continue to confirm
the historical accuracy or the literary antiquity of detail after detail in it
. . . It is, accordingly, sheer hypercriticism to deny the substantially Mosaic
character of the Pentateuchal tradition.’” (Gleason L. Archer, Jr., A Survey
of O. T. Intro., 1972, p. 165, citing W. F. Albright, The
American Scholar (1941) AP 224) Moses lived over 800 years before the Babylonian
Captivity, so the Genesis accounts were not based on Babylonian myths as
Reverend Carroll claims! (b) Also, “the
utter implausibility of a cube-shaped ark and an inundation of the entire world
by a mere fourteen day downpour” in the “Gilgamesh epic . . . stand in
opposition to the seaworthy dimensions and the gradual sinking of the waters in
the Biblical record.” (Ibid., Archer, p. 200-201) The antiquity and credibility
of the Genesis record versus the Babylonian stories show the Babylonian stories
to be corrupted forms of the true record!
(3) On the fear caused
by some evangelical teachers over President Trump’s deals with Arab nations,
deals that such teachers say look like the antichrist’s Daniel 9:27 predicted
treaty with the “many” that starts the Tribulation Period and that then suggests
that the Church now faces the antichrist and the Tribulation, (a) the
consistent literal interpretation of Scripture (b) leads us to see that Ephesians 2:11-3:10 teaches
that the Church was NOT revealed in Scripture before the start of the Church at Pentecost in Acts
2:1-13. Thus, all end time Bible prophecies
given before Pentecost address matters concerning ISRAEL
– NOT the CHURCH! [For example, Christ’s
pre-Pentecost prediction of the rapture of His Hebrew disciples in John
14:2-3 dealt only with Jesus’ Hebrew disciples in Israel, not with the Church. The rapture of the Church was revealed after Pentecost in Paul’s
epistles!] (c) Consequently, the pre-Pentecost prophecies of Daniel
9:27
and Matthew 24:3-51 on the Tribulation Period relate to matters regarding Israel –
not the Church! (d) For this
reason, we know that since Daniel 9:26 KJV predicted that “the people of the
prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary,” that
prediction was fulfilled in A. D. 70 when the Romans destroyed Israel’s
city of Jerusalem and Israel’s temple.
(e) That Roman army was then made up of native Europeans, so the “prince
that shall come,” the Daniel 9:27 antichrist, will be a native European. (f) That antichrist’s Daniel 9:27 seven-year
treaty with “many” is not a treaty with many Arab or other Gentile nations,
but with Israel, and this is how we know: (i) First, Daniel 9:24
reveals that Daniel 9:27 predicts the 70th set of the 70 sets of
seven-years that deal with Israel! (ii) Second, the “many” (rabim in
the Hebrew text, Ibid., Kittel, p. 1277) in Daniel 9:27 KJV with whom the
antichrist makes a treaty is Israel’s people, for the same term
“many” (rabim) is also used in Daniel 8:25 KJV of Israel’s
people whom Antiochus Epiphanes persecuted from 171 to 165 B. C.
(Ibid., p. 1275; Ryrie Study Bible, KJV, 1978, ftns. to Daniel 8:14 and
8:23-25). (g) As for Matthew 24:3-51, that
prophecy was given by Jesus in His earthly ministy before the
cross, and thus before Pentecost, so it predicted
what Israel and not the Church would face
in the Tribulation Period. For this reason, we know that
those who are “taken” in Matthew 24:40-41 are NOT Christians
who are “taken” by Christ to heaven in a posttribulation rapture, but rather unbelievers
who are “taken” by God’s angels to Hades in judgment
at Christ’s Second Coming to the earth!
Thus, interpreting the Bible in a consistently literal way equips us to
know the truth about end time events and to be at peace
about them like Paul directed us to be in 2 Thessalonians 2:1-2 and 16-17!
May we trust in Christ Who
died as our Atoning Sacrifice for sin that we might receive God’s gift of
eternal life. May we rely on God for the
capacity to do what is right regardless what evil influences we face.