THRU THE BIBLE
EXPOSITION
The Books Of The Chronicles:
God's Preservation Of His Davidic And Levitical Covenants
LII. Heeding God's
Authoritative Word
(2 Chronicles 36:11-21)
Introduction: (To show the need . . . )
Many people today lack a sense of
accountability to an absolute authority, and with it comes a lot of unrest:
(1) It occurs in society in general:
Daniel Henninger's column, "Amy Coney Barrett's Religiosity" (The
Wall Street Journal, October 15, 2020, cited in "Quotable," Republican-American,
October 16, 2020, p. 10) claimed that the decline "of an actively
practiced religion's self-organizing and self-disciplining function in American
life has" led to "a sustained social disaster . . . The decline was
less noticeable so long as public-school teachers still conveyed the basic ABCs
of right and wrong. But they stopped
doing that which left . . . nothing. The
result is on America's streets -- an increasingly absurd, often destructive
chaos of half-formed personal civic sentiments . . ."
(2) It occurs in Congress: Wall
Street Journal columnist Kimberley A. Strassel in her October 16, 2020 piece,
"A Justice Is Worth 1,000 Tweets" (Ibid., "Quotable,"
October 19, 2020, p. 8A) claimed, "' . . . (T)he (Amy Coney Barrett)
hearings" revealed one political party "wants judges to follow the
law, and" the other "wants a judiciary that does what political
overseers tell it to do."
(3) It occurs in the Roman Catholic
Church: a church member called me last Thursday expressing shock over news that
Pope Francis had condoned same-sex civil unions! Nicole Winfield's report, "Plot thickens
over origins of pope's civil union comments," Ibid., Republican-American,
October 23, 2020, p. 8A, added that the pope's remarks conflict with a
"2003 document from the Vatican's doctrine office" that "stated
the church's respect for gay people 'cannot lead in any way to approval of
homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions.'" Furthermore, The New American Bible For
Catholics, 1986 that has the September 18, 1970 papal blessing of Pope Paul
VI, at Leviticus 18:22 states: "You shall not lie with a male as with a
woman; such a thing is an abomination."
(4) It occurs in evangelicalism: theologians
"Rice and Pinnock see . . . an impossible contradiction between any
affirmation of God's sovereign foreordination and an affirmation of man's true
freedom," what "echoes the concern that has been the driving
motivation of modern atheism, whether in Ludwig Feurerback (who influenced Karl
Marx so strongly)" or in others. (Robert
B. Strimple, "What Does God Know?" in John H. Armstrong, gen. ed., The
Coming Evangelical Crisis, 1996, p. 142)
"Modern atheism answers" the tension "by declaring God
does not exist" while evangelicals "Rice and Pinnock . . . present a
reduced or 'limited' removal of God from the picture." (Ibid.) Accordingly, some evangelicals desire a new theology
where "God's wrath, newly defined, 'never means sending people to an
eternal hell.'" (R. Albert Mohler, Jr. "'Evangelical': What's In A
Name?", Ibid., Armstrong, p. 34)
Thus, reactions to the Calvinistic
view that God sovereignly chose who would trust in Christ that leaves no room
for human free will has led to the atheism of Marxism and extreme contemporary Arminianism
that elevates man's will to the point that God is left never sending anyone to
an eternal hell -- both very unbiblical views!
Need: So, we
ask, "If many lack a sense of accountability to absolute authority,
yielding unrest, what must I do?!"
I.
Judah's king Zedekiah, his officials and people did
not heed God's Word as if it were not authoritative:
A.
When
Zedekiah came to Judah's throne, he did what was evil in God's estimation, 2
Chronicles 36:11-12a.
B.
Indeed,
he, his officials and Judah's people treated God's call to repent as if His
Word were not authoritative:
1.
Zedekiah
did not humble himself before the Word of God spoken by the prophet Jeremiah
that called him to submit to Babylon's king, but he rebelled against him and
against the Lord, violating his initial oath in God's name to submit to
Babylon's king Nebuchadnezzar, 2 Chronicles 36:12b-13; Jeremiah 21:1-10.
2.
The
chief priests and the people practiced rampant idolatry in rebellion against the
Lord, 2 Chron. 36:14.
3.
God graciously
repeatedly sent His prophets to call Judah to repent, but the nation mocked
His messengers, despised His Word through them and scoffed at them,
2 Chronicles 36:15-16a ESV. The Hebrew verbs
for "mock," "despise" and "scoff" here are all [active]
participles in the Hebrew text, indicating repeat or habitual action. (Kittel, Bib.
Heb., p. 1434; B. D. B., A Heb. and Eng. Lex. of the O. T., p. 541, 102,
1073; Analyt. Grk. Lex. (Zon.), 1972, p. 71; Allen P. Ross; A Heb.
Hndbk., 1975, p. 36)
II.
However, God's Word IS authoritative, so His punishment fell EXACTLY as Scripture had predicted:
A.
God's
wrath was so aroused against Judah that He sent the Babylonians invade her,
slay her people and take all the holy vessels of the temple and treasures of
the king and his princes to Babylon, 2 Chron., 36:16b, 17-18.
B.
The
Babylonians burned the temple, destroyed the city walls and burned its palaces and
their valuables, v. 19.
C.
Babylon's
king took surviving Hebrews to Babylon where they served him until the reign of
the king of Persia. This captivity fulfilled the Jeremiah 29:10 prophecy that Israel
would be help captive for 70 years until the land had enjoyed its every-seventh-year
land Sabbaths that Israel had not kept for 490 years, 2 Chr. 36:20-21.
D.
Jeremiah's
prediction in turn fulfilled Moses' centuries-old Leviticus 26:33-35 prophecy that
if God sent Israel into captivity for her sin, the land would catch up on its
missed land Sabbaths that Israel had failed to observe!
Lesson: Though Zedekiah, his officials and
Judah's people treated God's Word as if it were not authoritative, it WAS
authoritative, so God fulfilled it EXACTLY as His prophets Jeremiah and Moses
had predicted.
Application:
(1) May we trust in Christ Who died as our Atoning Sacrifice for sin that we
might receive God's gift of eternal life, John 3:16; 1 Corinthians 15:1-11. (2) May we view Scripture as God's inspired,
authoritative Word, (3) and thus study it to understand its message and align
our lives in accord with its teaching for God's blessing.
Conclusion: (To illustrate the message . . . )
We apply God's authoritative
Word to address issues of concern we noted in our introduction (as follows):
(1) On the lack of a
sense of accountability to absolute authority in society and officials, we heed
1 Peter 2:13 and obey every ordinance of man, the exceptions being that we obey
Scripture over man's laws if they differ (Acts 5:29) and if man's laws
contradict one another and we must use common sense and good judgment.
(Proverbs 20:12)
(2) On the pope's
support for same-sex civil unions, Leviticus 18:22 in the Hebrew text
reads: "'You shall not lie, sexually cohabitate with' (tishkab,
second person imperfect masculine singular from shakab,
"lie;" Kittel, Biblia Hebraica, p. 172; The Analyt. Heb.
and Chaldee Lex. (Zon.), 1972, p. 779; B. D. B., A Heb. and Eng. Lex. of
the O. T., p. 1011-1012) a 'male' (zakar, Ibid., p. 271) as
in lying with a 'woman, female' ('ishah, Ibid., Kittel; Ibid., B.
D. B., p. 61); it [the act] (emphatic pronoun hu') is an
abomination (to'ebah, Ibid., Kittel; Ibid., B. D. B., p.
1072-1073) We thus hold that the only upright
sexual union that exists for humans involves a man and a woman in marriage.
(3) On the debate over
election and predestination, (a) the trouble began in the fifth century A. D.
when British monk Pelagius adopted pagan Stoic belief to hold, "'If I
ought, I can'" be a Christian by contributing to his salvation. (A. Williston
Walker, A Hist. of the Christ. Chch., 1959, p. 168) Bishop Augustine of North Africa opposed
Pelagius' view, claiming salvation is so fully the work of God that God authors
even one's faith in Christ. (B. B. Warfield, Calvin and Augustine, 1974,
p. 378) However, Augustine was affected
by pagan Neo-platonism, an errant pantheistic view that held man was an
extension of God, leading Augustine to conclude that God authored man's faith. (Ibid.,
p. 375, 395-396; Gorton Carruth, ed. in chief, The Vol. Library, 2994,
v.22, p. 2025-2026) The Church has thus long
battled over Stoic-laced Pelagian error and Neo-platonic-laced Augustinian error
on election and predestination until today, Stoic-laced Pelagian Arminianism
and Neo-platonic-laced Augustinian Calvinism oppose one another.
(b) We thus expound
Scripture free of both Stoicism and
Neo-platonism, and find that Scripture perfectly harmonizes God's and man's
wills (as follows): (i) On man's will, John 3:16 KJV claims God so "loved"
the "world," that He gave His only, unique Son that "whosoever
believeth" in Him might not perish, but have eternal life. (+) The "world" here cannot be "world
of the elect who will believe" as some Calvinists teach, for then Jesus would
have said that not all of the elect will be saved as only "whosoever
believeth" of that "world" will be saved when all the elect in
reality will be saved! (+)
Thus, all human beings worldwide must have free will to believe in Christ. (ii) As for God's sovereignty in salvation,
Ephesians 2:8-9 claims salvation is by grace through faith apart from human works. The Pelagian view of a self-help contribution
to one's salvation counters this Biblical claim, so Pelagianism greatly errs. The work of saving the soul is entirely the
work of a sovereign God performed in His infinite grace.
(c) In our lessons
with the URL "Making Sense of God's Election" on our Church web
site's home page, we show that election involves God's choosing those from
eternity past whom He foreknew would trust in Christ unto blessings that follow
justification, and His predestination works to make the saved participate in
those blessings. Man freely decides to
believe in Christ, and God in grace sovereignly saves him as a gift to the one
who thus believes.
(d) Many Bible verses
are "battlegrounds" in the Calvinist-Arminian debate, and we cover each
one in our lessons cited above. However,
Acts 13:48b is likely the "biggest" one, and in the KJV it reads,
" . . . (A)s many as were ordained to eternal life believed." Our lessons cited above show how this verse was
mistranslated, that it should read, " . . . (A)s many 'had marshaled
themselves on the side of' (middle perfect participle of the Greek verb tasso)
eternal life believed." The perfect
middle and perfect passive participle in New Testament Greek are
spelled the same way. Calvinists
have read it as a passive where we show in our lessons that the context
reveals it is a middle!
May we trust in
Christ Who died as our Atoning Sacrifice for sin that we might receive God's
gift of eternal life. May we then view
Scripture as God's authoritative Word and heed its truth for blessing.