THRU THE BIBLE
EXPOSITION
The Books Of
Kings: The Kings Of Israel And Judah From Solomon To The Babylonian Captivity
III. The Latter
Era Of The Divided Kingdom, 2 Kings 2:1-27:41
H. Effectively Guarding
Ourselves From Deception
(2 Kings 5:20-27)
Introduction: (To show the need . . . )
We live in a world of deception, and
we need to understand how to overcome it.
We illustrate as follows:
(1) On the secular stage, Alice
Bailey who wrote 24 books, claimed to have done so "under the direction of
a spirit guide," and one of her devoted followers was Robert Muller who
won a contest in 1948 on "'how to govern the world.'" (Brannon Howse,
The Coming Religious Reich, 2015, p. 2, 5) Mr. Muller eventually became "assistant
secretary general" at "the United Nations" and helped develop
"'The World Core Curriculum'" that America and many other nations
have "incorporated into their educational systems," Ibid., p. 5. Muller's system showed up in the
"America 2000 program of President George H. Bush, Goals 2000 of President
Bill Clinton, No Child Left Behind of President George W. Bush" and the
"Common Core of President Barak Obama," Ibid., p. 5-6.
In other words, what many people do
not know is that the United States' public education system has been impacted
by demonic influence through a long line of various parties.
(2) In religious circles, Rick
Warren, author of The Purpose Driven Life, in a forum where he met with
former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, has stated "'that the only way a
global peace could happen on planet earth in the future would be for all faiths
to work together and do good together.'" (Ibid., Howse, p. 9 citing Roger
Oakland, "Globalization: A Special Report,"
http://www.understandingthetimes. org/commentary/c86.shtml)
Thus, what many may not know, an
evangelical pastor whose book has sold 30 million copies (Ibid., p. 8) violates
Galatians 1:8-9 that directs believers to part company with those who hold to a
false gospel.
(3) At the grassroots level,
"(e)ven the most honest among" the general public "practices
deception, with various studies showing that the average person lies several
times a day." ("Deception," psychologytoday.com)
If lying and deception is common among
the general public, deception is something we all face every day.
Need: So we ask, "If strong deception abounds in
today's world, what does God want us to do to overcome it?!"
I.
2 Kings 5:20 records how Elisha's servant,
Gehazi, became self-deceived into thinking that it was God's will that he run
after the departing Naaman to acquire his reward when just the opposite was true:
A.
In 2
Kings 5:15-16 when Naaman tried to get Elisha to accept Naaman's reward for
healing him of leprosy, Elisha's servant Gehazi would have witnessed his master
take an oath in God's name not to accept the reward.
B.
However,
in 2 Kings 5:20, Gehazi himself took an oath in the Lord's name to do just the
opposite of what he had witnessed his master Elisha do -- to run after Naaman and
accept some of his reward!
II.
2 Kings 5:21-27 then records how Gehazi applied
his oath and how God severely punished him for it:
A.
When
Gehazi ran after Naaman and caught up with him, he deceptively told Naaman that
Elisha had just been visited by two men of the school of the prophets who were
in material need, that Elisha was now requesting some of Naaman's reward to be given
to Gehazi toward meeting these prophets' needs, 2 Kings 5:21-22.
B.
Naaman was
eager to help, and he urged Gehazi to take more than he had requested, and
Gehazi greedily agreed, and returned to hide the reward from Elisha before
returning to his master, 2 Kings 5:23-25a.
C.
Nevertheless,
God had informed Elisha of Gehazi's actions, so when Elisha confronted him
about it, Gehazi brazenly lied, claiming he had not gone anywhere, 2 Kings
5:25b.
D.
Elisha
then revealed how God had shown him that Gehazi had desired to acquire an
expansive estate with the reward Naaman offered, what violated God's will under
the circumstances so that Gehazi and his descendants would be plagued with the
very leprosy that had infected Naaman, 2 Kings 5:26-27.
III.
However, NOTING the CIRCUMSTANCES of Gehazi's SELF-DECEPTION
in his going from hearing Elisha take an oath in God's name to reject Naaman's
reward to himself taking an oath in God's name to do just the opposite, we note
how Gehazi COULD have AVOIDED his self-deception (as follows):
A.
Gehazi
could have avoided self-deception by following his spiritual overseer and
example, 2 Kings 5:20, 16:
1.
2 Kings
5:20 repeatedly emphasizes the fact that Elisha was Gehazi's spiritual overseer
and example:
a.
Gehazi's
name and title as "servant of Elisha" and Elisha's name and title as
"the man of God" are used in close proximity to one another in the
same verse to emphasize Elisha's spiritual headship over Gehazi.
b.
Gehazi also
calls Elisha "my master" in 2 Kings 5:20, further emphasizing
Elisha's headship over him.
2.
Accordingly,
Gehazi was responsible as the spiritual subordinate to Elisha to follow his master's example
not to receive Naaman's reward, what would have avoided Gehazi's later
self-deception and sin!
B.
Gehazi
could have avoided self-deception by heeding Elisha's reasons for refusing
Naaman's reward, v. 16:
1.
Gehazi was
required to follow his master Elisha's lead in glorifying God as the Master of
them both:
a.
Elisha's
oath in God's name to refuse Naaman's reward had been prefaced by his remark
that he "stood before" the Lord, referring to his standing before his
Superior, his Master, the Lord God of Israel.
b.
Gehazi
should thus have realized that if his master Elisha was subject to God as God's
servant, then Gehazi was also subject to God, that to obey God, he should
refuse Naaman's reward like Elisha had done!
2.
Gehazi
should have heeded Elisha's concern that God and not Elisha receive the glory
for healing Naaman:
a.
Elisha's
refusal to take Naaman's reward arose from his desire that his Lord be honored
for the healing.
b.
Gehazi
should have thus realized that he along with Elisha was responsible to honor God
before Naaman by refusing the reward lest receiving Naaman's reward detract
from God's glory in Naaman's viewpoint!
C.
Third,
Gehazi could have avoided self-deception by obeying Scripture on heeding a true
prophet like Elisha:
1.
Deuteronomy
18:18-19 told Israel's people to heed the words of His prophets in
accountability to the Lord.
2.
To
discern who was a true from a false prophet, Deuteronomy 18:20-22 revealed that
true prophets had a perfect track record on their predictions where false prophets
would fail to have a perfect record.
3.
Since
Elisha had a perfect track record as a prophet, God via Deuteronomy 18:18-22
held Gehazi directly responsible to align his words and actions with Elisha's
words and actions in refusing Naaman's reward!
Lesson: By (1) not following Elisha, his
spiritual overseer and example, by (2) not heeding Elisha's reasons for
refusing Naaman's reward and by (3) not heeding Scripture regarding a credible
prophet like Elisha, Gehazi deceived himself into taking some of Naaman's
reward, resulting in the Lord's severely punishing him.
Application: (1) May we trust in Christ to be
saved, John 3:16. (2) May we guard
ourselves from being deceived (a) by following the lead of our spiritual
overseers and examples, (b) by paying attention to their reasons for the stands
they take and (c) by heeding Scripture on all matters. (d) May we [in the dispensation of the Church
era] also by faith rely on the discernment-providing Holy Spirit for
discernment as is taught in 1 John 2:20, 27.
Conclusion: (To illustrate the message . . . )
Many of us have
attended religious services where the presiding minister has led those present
to say the Lord's Prayer ("Our Father") and often also the Ave Maria
("Hail Mary") prayer to Mary, but even many evangelicals do not
discern that Scripture and the will of God greatly oppose both prayers used this
way! We explain (as follows):
(1) When Jesus gave
the Lord's Prayer to His disciples in Matthew 6:9-13, He prefaced it by telling
His disciples NOT to pray using "meaningless
repetition" like the pagans who thought they would be heard "for
their many words," Matthew 6:7 NASV.
Nevertheless, in violation of Jesus' preface, the Lord's Prayer itself has
often been made to become a "meaningless repetition" as ministers direct
people to say it as a ritual in many a religious service!
(2) The Ave Maria was formed
by the Roman Catholic Church out of the Creed of Chalcedon that was made in 431
A. D. The ancient Church was then rightfully
countering the Nestorian heresy that claimed Jesus was two persons and not the Biblical
view that He is one Person with two natures, one human and the other divine. The Creed of Chalcedon was thus authored to assert
that Jesus was "(b)orn of the Virgin Mary, the Mother of God according
to the manhood." (Loraine Boettner, Roman Catholicism,
1978, p. 133-134)
However, in forming its Ave Maria, the Roman Catholic
Church omitted the "according to the manhood" phrase to
claim that Mary is "Mother of God" and add that she is "full of
grace" to promote hyperdulia, the worship of Mary, Ibid. This was a theological disaster: to address Mary
in prayer as "Mother of God" and not qualify that term is to pray to the
goddess Mary and make Jesus' deity begin when the goddess Mary conceived Him as
in polytheism!
Scripture
clarifies the truth: (a) John 1:14 ESV states: "(T)he Word [i.e.,
God; John 1:1] became flesh and dwelt
among us, and we have seen his [one Person] glory . . . as of the
only Son of the Father, full of
grace and truth." We thus overcome deception to (i) improve the
Creed of Chalcedon's stand against the Nestorian heresy by suggesting that it
read "Mother of One Who is both God and man," (ii) to counter
the "Mother of God" term in a prayer, (iii) to counter the Ave Maria claim
that Mary is the one who is "full of grace" by asserting
it is JESUS Who is "full of grace and truth" and (iv) to
counter hyperdulia. (b) In addition, 1
Timothy 2:5 claims there is one Mediator between God and man, the man
Christ Jesus, not Christ Jesus and Mary, so we oppose
the use of Ave Maria prayer!
May we trust in
Christ for salvation. May we overcome
deception by following proven overseers and examples, by paying heed to their
reasons for their stands and by heeding Scripture as our final authority.