THRU THE BIBLE
EXPOSITION
The Books Of
Kings: The Kings Of Israel And Judah From Solomon To The Babylonian Captivity
II. The Divided
Kingdom, 1 Kings 12:1-22:53
E. Heeding
Scripture Over Influential Women
(1 Kings 14:21-31)
Introduction: (To show the need . . . )
(1) In today's world, we often hear
about the mistreatment and disrespect of women by abusive men: for example, U.
S. Representative Elizabeth Esty's (D-Conn.) former "chief of staff Tony
Baker" made "threats to kill a female staffer he'd once dated."
(Heather Caygle, "Rep. Esty won't seek reelection after mishandling
harassment allegations," citing The Washington Post; politico.com,
April 2, 2018). Such abuse is too common
in the workplace as illustrated by Representative Esty's own recent statement
about it "in a Facebook post" when she wrote, "Too many women
have been harmed by harassment in the workplace," Ibid.
(2) However, even influential women
like Representative Esty can function in bad ways: (a) she "kept her
then-chief of staff Tony Baker on the payroll for three months in 2016, even
after she learned of Baker's threats" to kill the female staffer he'd once
dated, and "Baker left the office in August 2016 but . . . received a
$5,000 severance and a positive letter of recommendation for employment from
Esty" according to the Post. (Ibid.)
(b) This occurs locally: a story by
Brigitte Ruthman ("No prison for ex-caregiver," Republican-American,
March 30, 2018, p. 1B) told how Tara Yard stole "more than $69,000 from an
elderly woman in her care" regardless of Tara's "longtime insistence
that missing funds were the result of shoddy bookkeeping or the fault of
others." She finally admitted
"to stealing funds" by "fund transfers, payments for hours not
worked and cash payments," Ibid.
We tend to believe that a woman who would
assume the responsibility of caring for an elderly lady would surely be
trustworthy in how she handled the elderly lady's money, but such trust can be
misplaced!
Need: So, we ask, "If even influential women
we tend to trust can function in bad ways, how are we to handle it?"
I.
King Rehoboam's pagan Ammonite mother, Naamah, greatly
influenced him to worship her false god, Molech, what resulted in the apostasy of
the Southern Kingdom of Judah, 1 Kings 14:21-24:
A.
The
author at 1 Kings 14:21 sharply contrasted Judah's God with Rehoboam's Ammonite
mother, Naamah:
1.
The
Hebrew text at 1 Kings 14:21a highlights the fact that Jerusalem where Jeroboam
ruled was the city out of all the tribes of Israel where God, Jahweh, had chosen to put His Name.
(Kittel, Bib. Heb., p. 537)
2.
Yet, the
next sentence in the Hebrew text opens with the phrase, "And the name
of his mother . . .", clearly
contrasting the name of Jahweh (v. 21a) with the name
of Rehoboam's mother, Naamah (v.
21b), Ibid.
B.
This contrast
in names reveals Rehoboam turned from Jahweh to his mother's
false god, 1 Kings 14:22-24:
a.
Naamah's
influence over Rehoboam was so great, he followed her god Molech (Milcom KJV), and
all Judah departed from God though His Name was uniquely attached to Jerusalem
where Rehoboam ruled.
b.
Consequently,
the nation came to worship pagan gods throughout the land more than had their
fathers in the era of the Judges, and male shrine prostitutes were introduced in
the land, sinking Judah to the level of evil practiced by the Canaanites whom God
had called Joshua to destroy from the land, Ibid., p. 517-518.
II.
God thus punished Rehoboam in a way to teach him
three lessons -- (1) to abandon Molech and (2) trust in God for financial
prosperity and also (3) to heed Scripture above his idolatrous mother's influence:
A.
First, God
punished Rehoboam in a way that critiqued his idolatry with his Ammonite
mother's god, Molech:
1.
In
fulfillment of His Davidic Covenant promise to discipline the Davidic king with
the "rod of men," God let Pharaoh Shishak come against Jerusalem not
to slay its people, but to seize the treasures of the temple and the king's
palace, including Solomon's gold shields, 1 Kings 14:25-26 with 10:16-17; 2 Samuel
7:14.
2.
This
seizure of his treasures was God's critique of Rehoboam's worship of his Ammonite
mother's god, for the Ammonites would sacrifice their firstborn to Molech
(Milcom KJV) to gain financial prosperity for the rest of the family. (gotquestions.com,
"Who was Moloch/Molech?"; Bible Know. Com., O. T., p. 517)
B.
Second,
God's punishment aimed to teach Rehoboam to trust in Him, not Molech, for financial
prosperity:
1.
Rehoboam's
loss of the gold shields should have caused him to recall how his father had
acquired them.
2.
The obvious
answer was that Israel's true God had promised Solomon great riches since
Solomon had looked to Him for the wisdom he needed to rule Israel, cf. 1 Kings
3:12-13. The acquisition of these riches
and the national security that had enabled Solomon to hang his gold shields up
in his palace hall unafraid of their possible seizure by some foreign ruler
were all due to God's provision and protection!
3.
Thus, Rehoboam's
loss of wealth was God's discipline to to show him his need to trust in God,
not Molech, for financial prosperity so the Lord might fulfill His Deuteronomy
17:14-20 promises to bless him as king!
C.
Third,
God also critiqued Rehoboam for heeding his idolatrous mother above Scripture:
1.
Adam
sinned by heeding his insubordinate wife Eve above God's Word, so God judged Adam
to have the ground be fittingly insubordinate to him, Gen. 3:17-19; H. C.
Leupold, Exp. of Genesis, 1974, v. I, p. 173.
2.
Similarly,
by letting Pharaoh seize much of Rehoboam's wealth, the Lord rebuked Rehoboam
for heeding his pagan mother's influence to worship her Ammonite god Molech to
obtain financial prosperity over Scripture's charge in Exodus 20:1-4 that he worship
God alone!
III.
However, Rehoboam failed to heed God's discipline
in trying to secure his financial welfare by his own futile efforts while
heeding His Ammonite mother's lead to keep following Molech, 1 Kings 14:27-28:
A.
Instead
of wholeheartedly repenting toward God for blessing, Rehoboam tried to bolster
his financial welfare by typical pagan self-help through making bronze shields to
replace his lost gold ones, 1 Kings 14:27a!
B.
Then,
instead of hanging the bronze shields up on his palace hall walls where they also
might be seized by Pharaoh, Rehoboam assigned their care to the officers of the
guard who kept them locked up, 1 Kings 14:27b.
C.
Only
when Rehoboam went in formal procession to the temple of the Lord did he direct
the guards to bring out the shields, and even then he did not hang the shields up
on the palace hall walls, but had them carried under armed guard when his
palace soldiers escorted him to and from the temple, 1 Kings 14:27b-28 ESV!
D.
Rehoboam
feared that even his bronze shields were vulnerable to seizure by Pharaoh unlike
the security and wealth his father Solomon had enjoyed with his gold shields in
divine blessing. Instead of turning to
the Lord with a whole heart for financial and national security so as to trust
in Him, in typical pagan fashion, king Rehoboam tried to manipulate circumstances
around him, still worshiping Molech under his mother's sway while trying to
appease God by at times visiting His temple escorted by soldiers who bore his
bronze shields!
IV.
1 Kings 14:29-31 reveals that for the rest of
his life, Rehoboam warred against Jeroboam, lacking real blessing. 1 Kings 14:31 SUMS up his life by REPEATING
the 1 Kings 14:21b claim that Naamah, his mother, was an Ammonite, AGAIN noting HER HARMFUL IDOLATROUS INFLUENCE OVER HIM!
Lesson: By yielding to his influential pagan mother's
sway to worship her Ammonite god Molech for financial security, Rehoboam was
disciplined by God in accord with the Davidic Covenant to suffer financial loss
even of the gold shields his father had hung in his palace hall. However, Rehoboam failed to learn of his need
to turn from his influential mother's Molech worship to trust in God alone, so
he suffered continued financial lack and national insecurity instead of the
wealth and security God had originally designed for him.
Application: (1) May we trust in Christ for
salvation and eternal life, John 3:16.
(2) Then, may we look to God's written Word above ALL other sources of
influence, including influential women, and obey GOD through His Word for
comprehensive blessing. (3) If we are an adult man, we should NOT submit to ANY
woman ANYWAY according to God's 1 Timothy 2:12-14 divine order that was set at
creation in Genesis 2:21-24!
Conclusion: (To illustrate the message . . . )
The March-April, 2018 Answers
magazine, p. 47, reported how some "doulas," women who usually volunteer
to "provide support to women during labor," now support women who are
having an abortion, sitting with them "throughout the procedure" to
"reassure them that they are brave for not keeping their baby."
(Ibid.)
However, Scripture
reveals that these abortion procedures are murder: Exodus 21:22-23 teaches if a
pregnant woman gives birth (lit., "sends out her child," weya'su
yeladeha, NOT "miscarries," what would be teshakel, Ibid.,
Kittel, p. 111; B. D. B., A Heb. and Eng. Lex. of the O. T., p. 409,
422-425; 1013) because a man who is fighting another man hits her so as to
cause her child to come out at any trimester, if a life is lost, the
man who hit her must be executed for murder.
The life that is lost here cannot be just the mother's life, for the
verb is not "miscarry" to mean the fetus is already dead so that we
are dealing only with the mother, but it is "give birth," and the murder
of a mother was already condemned back in Exodus 20:13. Rather, Exodus 21:22-23 contextually must
refer either to the mother or to her
child who was just born! If one
then causes an unborn child at any trimester to die, he kills a
human being!
However, abortion
clinic doulas do not think or act biblically on the
issue of abortion -- they do not heed Exodus 21:22-23 so as to view and
therefore treat the unborn infant at any trimester as a human being, so they
can only give the women they seek to console a false comfort that is not God's true
comfort with His blessing.
May we trust in Christ for salvation. Then, may we FOCUS on heeding Scripture ABOVE
the sway of prominent and influential women to the contrary, that we thus avoid
being misled and gain God's blessing!